1 files changed, 0 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild b/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
deleted file mode 100644
index 7ee816d44a72..000000000000
--- a/media-fonts/urw-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9.ebuild
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
-# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
-
-EAPI=7
-
-# At some point URW++ released fonts under GPL license. After that they were took
-# and improved by Valek Filippov and this work was somehow related with AFPL...
-# At least it can be found on their svn server:
-# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/trunk/urw-fonts/
-
-# Also, some time ago, sources where published on sf.net:
-# https://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/files/
-# At this point this package was published on a nuber of other sites
-# (gimp.org/cups.org) and media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std was added to the tree.
-# But nobody use that old releases any mover and everybody syncs with
-# svn.ghostscript.com. The most recent tag there is:
-# http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/urw-fonts-1.0.7pre44/
-
-# But note that version we have is different from upstream tag. This happened
-# because we started to use redhat versions and followed their versioning. It's
-# hard to say why they use such strange version since they also sync with
-# svn.ghostscript.com. Redhat's ChangeLog states:
-# Tue Jan 8 23:00:00 2008 Than Ngo 2.4-2
-#  - update to 1.0.7pre44
-
-inherit estack rpm font
-
-MY_PV=$(ver_rs 2 -)
-
-DESCRIPTION="free good quality fonts gpl'd by URW++"
-HOMEPAGE="http://www.urwpp.de/"
-SRC_URI="mirror://gentoo/${PN}-${MY_PV}.fc13.src.rpm"
-
-LICENSE="GPL-2"
-SLOT="0"
-KEYWORDS="~alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 sparc x86 ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~arm64-macos ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x64-solaris"
-
-RDEPEND="
-	!media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-std
-	!media-fonts/gnu-gs-fonts-other"
-
-S="${WORKDIR}"
-
-DOCS="ChangeLog README*"
-FONT_S="${S}"
-FONT_SUFFIX="afm pfb pfm"
-
-pkg_postinst() {
-	font_pkg_postinst
-
-	elog "If you upgraded from ${PN}-2.1-r2 some fonts will look a bit"
-	elog "different. Take a look at bug #208990 if interested."
-}