summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch')
-rw-r--r--dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch121
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..781b0c8f48b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23
+https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4791e79b8803924b28c19af4d4036ad85335110d
+
+From fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
+Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 16:36:35 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix DH_check() excessive time with over sized modulus
+
+The DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
+that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus
+value even if it is excessively large.
+
+There is already a maximum DH modulus size (10,000 bits) over which
+OpenSSL will not generate or derive keys. DH_check() will however still
+perform various tests for validity on such a large modulus. We introduce a
+new maximum (32,768) over which DH_check() will just fail.
+
+An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters
+obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of
+Service attack.
+
+The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL
+functions. An application calling any of those other functions may
+similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are
+DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().
+
+CVE-2023-3446
+
+Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
+Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
+Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
+Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
+(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21451)
+
+(cherry picked from commit 9e0094e2aa1b3428a12d5095132f133c078d3c3d)
+--- a/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
++++ b/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
+@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ int DH_check(const DH *dh, int *ret)
+ if (nid != NID_undef)
+ return 1;
+
++ /* Don't do any checks at all with an excessively large modulus */
++ if (BN_num_bits(dh->params.p) > OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS) {
++ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_DH, DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE);
++ return 0;
++ }
++
+ if (!DH_check_params(dh, ret))
+ return 0;
+
+--- a/include/openssl/dh.h
++++ b/include/openssl/dh.h
+@@ -92,7 +92,11 @@ int EVP_PKEY_CTX_get0_dh_kdf_ukm(EVP_PKEY_CTX *ctx, unsigned char **ukm);
+ # include <openssl/dherr.h>
+
+ # ifndef OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
+-# define OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 10000
++# define OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 10000
++# endif
++
++# ifndef OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
++# define OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 32768
+ # endif
+
+ # define OPENSSL_DH_FIPS_MIN_MODULUS_BITS 1024
+
+From 4791e79b8803924b28c19af4d4036ad85335110d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
+Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:39:48 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Add a test for CVE-2023-3446
+
+Confirm that the only errors DH_check() finds with DH parameters with an
+excessively long modulus is that the modulus is too large. We should not
+be performing time consuming checks using that modulus.
+
+Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
+Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
+Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
+Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
+(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21451)
+
+(cherry picked from commit ede782b4c8868d1f09c9cd237f82b6f35b7dba8b)
+--- a/test/dhtest.c
++++ b/test/dhtest.c
+@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int dh_test(void)
+ goto err1;
+
+ /* check fails, because p is way too small */
+- if (!DH_check(dh, &i))
++ if (!TEST_true(DH_check(dh, &i)))
+ goto err2;
+ i ^= DH_MODULUS_TOO_SMALL;
+ if (!TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_PRIME)
+@@ -124,6 +124,17 @@ static int dh_test(void)
+ /* We'll have a stale error on the queue from the above test so clear it */
+ ERR_clear_error();
+
++ /* Modulus of size: dh check max modulus bits + 1 */
++ if (!TEST_true(BN_set_word(p, 1))
++ || !TEST_true(BN_lshift(p, p, OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS)))
++ goto err3;
++
++ /*
++ * We expect no checks at all for an excessively large modulus
++ */
++ if (!TEST_false(DH_check(dh, &i)))
++ goto err3;
++
+ /*
+ * II) key generation
+ */
+@@ -138,7 +149,7 @@ static int dh_test(void)
+ goto err3;
+
+ /* ... and check whether it is valid */
+- if (!DH_check(a, &i))
++ if (!TEST_true(DH_check(a, &i)))
+ goto err3;
+ if (!TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_PRIME)
+ || !TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_SAFE_PRIME)
+