summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch')
-rw-r--r--dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch121
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 121 deletions
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 781b0c8f48b3..000000000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.1-CVE-2023-3446.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,121 +0,0 @@
-https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23
-https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4791e79b8803924b28c19af4d4036ad85335110d
-
-From fc9867c1e03c22ebf56943be205202e576aabf23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 16:36:35 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Fix DH_check() excessive time with over sized modulus
-
-The DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters
-that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus
-value even if it is excessively large.
-
-There is already a maximum DH modulus size (10,000 bits) over which
-OpenSSL will not generate or derive keys. DH_check() will however still
-perform various tests for validity on such a large modulus. We introduce a
-new maximum (32,768) over which DH_check() will just fail.
-
-An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters
-obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of
-Service attack.
-
-The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL
-functions. An application calling any of those other functions may
-similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are
-DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().
-
-CVE-2023-3446
-
-Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
-Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21451)
-
-(cherry picked from commit 9e0094e2aa1b3428a12d5095132f133c078d3c3d)
---- a/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
-+++ b/crypto/dh/dh_check.c
-@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ int DH_check(const DH *dh, int *ret)
- if (nid != NID_undef)
- return 1;
-
-+ /* Don't do any checks at all with an excessively large modulus */
-+ if (BN_num_bits(dh->params.p) > OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS) {
-+ ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_DH, DH_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-+
- if (!DH_check_params(dh, ret))
- return 0;
-
---- a/include/openssl/dh.h
-+++ b/include/openssl/dh.h
-@@ -92,7 +92,11 @@ int EVP_PKEY_CTX_get0_dh_kdf_ukm(EVP_PKEY_CTX *ctx, unsigned char **ukm);
- # include <openssl/dherr.h>
-
- # ifndef OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
--# define OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 10000
-+# define OPENSSL_DH_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 10000
-+# endif
-+
-+# ifndef OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS
-+# define OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS 32768
- # endif
-
- # define OPENSSL_DH_FIPS_MIN_MODULUS_BITS 1024
-
-From 4791e79b8803924b28c19af4d4036ad85335110d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:39:48 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] Add a test for CVE-2023-3446
-
-Confirm that the only errors DH_check() finds with DH parameters with an
-excessively long modulus is that the modulus is too large. We should not
-be performing time consuming checks using that modulus.
-
-Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
-Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21451)
-
-(cherry picked from commit ede782b4c8868d1f09c9cd237f82b6f35b7dba8b)
---- a/test/dhtest.c
-+++ b/test/dhtest.c
-@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int dh_test(void)
- goto err1;
-
- /* check fails, because p is way too small */
-- if (!DH_check(dh, &i))
-+ if (!TEST_true(DH_check(dh, &i)))
- goto err2;
- i ^= DH_MODULUS_TOO_SMALL;
- if (!TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_PRIME)
-@@ -124,6 +124,17 @@ static int dh_test(void)
- /* We'll have a stale error on the queue from the above test so clear it */
- ERR_clear_error();
-
-+ /* Modulus of size: dh check max modulus bits + 1 */
-+ if (!TEST_true(BN_set_word(p, 1))
-+ || !TEST_true(BN_lshift(p, p, OPENSSL_DH_CHECK_MAX_MODULUS_BITS)))
-+ goto err3;
-+
-+ /*
-+ * We expect no checks at all for an excessively large modulus
-+ */
-+ if (!TEST_false(DH_check(dh, &i)))
-+ goto err3;
-+
- /*
- * II) key generation
- */
-@@ -138,7 +149,7 @@ static int dh_test(void)
- goto err3;
-
- /* ... and check whether it is valid */
-- if (!DH_check(a, &i))
-+ if (!TEST_true(DH_check(a, &i)))
- goto err3;
- if (!TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_PRIME)
- || !TEST_false(i & DH_CHECK_P_NOT_SAFE_PRIME)
-