1 files changed, 0 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/dev-libs/libatomic_ops/files/libatomic_ops-1.2-ppc64-load_acquire.patch b/dev-libs/libatomic_ops/files/libatomic_ops-1.2-ppc64-load_acquire.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9b6baa188cf7..000000000000
--- a/dev-libs/libatomic_ops/files/libatomic_ops-1.2-ppc64-load_acquire.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
---- src/atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/powerpc.h.orig	2006-03-28 22:49:14.000000000 +0000
-+++ src/atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/powerpc.h	2007-06-08 23:10:07.000000000 +0000
-@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
- /* seems to be that a data dependent branch followed by an isync is 	*/
- /* cheaper.  And the documentation is fairly explicit that this also 	*/
- /* has acquire semantics.						*/
-+/* ppc64 uses ld not lwz */
-+#if defined(__powerpc64__) || defined(__ppc64__) || defined(__64BIT__)
- AO_INLINE AO_t
- AO_load_acquire(volatile AO_t *addr)
- {
-@@ -72,7 +74,7 @@
-   /* registers.  I always got "impossible constraint" when I	*/
-   /* tried the "y" constraint.					*/
-   __asm__ __volatile__ (
--    "lwz %0,%1\n"
-+    "ld %0,%1\n"
-     "cmpw cr7,%0,%0\n"
-     "bne- cr7,1f\n"
-     "1: isync\n"
-@@ -80,7 +82,25 @@
-     : "m"(*addr) : "memory", "cc");
-   return result;
- }
-+#else
-+AO_INLINE AO_t
-+AO_load_acquire(volatile AO_t *addr)
-+{
-+  AO_t result;
- 
-+  /* FIXME: We should get gcc to allocate one of the condition	*/
-+  /* registers.  I always got "impossible constraint" when I	*/
-+  /* tried the "y" constraint.					*/
-+  __asm__ __volatile__ (
-+    "lwz %0,%1\n"
-+    "cmpw cr7,%0,%0\n"
-+    "bne- cr7,1f\n"
-+    "1: isync\n"
-+    : "=r" (result)
-+    : "m"(*addr) : "memory", "cc");
-+  return result;
-+}
-+#endif
- #define AO_HAVE_load_acquire
- 
- /* We explicitly specify store_release, since it relies 	*/