1 files changed, 0 insertions, 146 deletions
diff --git a/dev-libs/elfutils/files/elfutils-0.185-configure.ac-rework-gnu99-ext-check-to-allow-clang.patch b/dev-libs/elfutils/files/elfutils-0.185-configure.ac-rework-gnu99-ext-check-to-allow-clang.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index fe0b111ca859..000000000000
--- a/dev-libs/elfutils/files/elfutils-0.185-configure.ac-rework-gnu99-ext-check-to-allow-clang.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,146 +0,0 @@
-From c9ff5c53c319f963cac34a41c86cd43edf902459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:43:13 +0300
-Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: rework gnu99 ext check to allow clang
-
-It is true that Clang does not support all gnu99 extensions [1],
-but not all of them are used in the codebase and over time there
-have been code cleanup efforts to improve Clang support.
-
-For example after commit 779c57ea ("readelf: Pull advance_pc()
-in file scope") there are no more nested function declarations
-and elfutils now builds fine with Clang.
-
-So in the interest of enabling Clang builds we remove the only
-remaining blocker: the configure checks for nested functions and
-variable length arrays which are also unused.
-
-Considering mixed decls and code is also part of c99 standard,
-the entire check becomes redundant and we can just replace
-AC_PROG_CC -> AC_PROG_CC_C99.
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport [master commit 6eb991a9]
-
-[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24964
-[Adrian: backported to v0.185]
-Signed-off-by: Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
----
- configure    | 48 ------------------------------------------------
- configure.ac | 35 +----------------------------------
- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 82 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/configure b/configure
-index 4ea75ee..22bda6c 100755
---- a/configure
-+++ b/configure
-@@ -5162,54 +5162,6 @@ else
- fi
- 
- 
--# We use -std=gnu99 but have explicit checks for some language constructs
--# and GNU extensions since some compilers claim GNU99 support, but don't
--# really support all language extensions. In particular we need
--# Mixed Declarations and Code
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Mixed-Declarations.html
--# Nested Functions
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
--# Arrays of Variable Length
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Length.html
--{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for gcc with GNU99 support" >&5
--$as_echo_n "checking for gcc with GNU99 support... " >&6; }
--if ${ac_cv_c99+:} false; then :
--  $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
--else
--  old_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
--CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -std=gnu99"
--cat confdefs.h - <<_ACEOF >conftest.$ac_ext
--/* end confdefs.h.  */
--int foo (int a)
--{
--  for (int i = 0; i < a; ++i) if (i % 4) break; int s = a; return s;
--}
--
--double bar (double a, double b)
--{
--  double square (double z) { return z * z; }
--  return square (a) + square (b);
--}
--
--void baz (int n)
--{
--  struct S { int x[n]; };
--}
--_ACEOF
--if ac_fn_c_try_compile "$LINENO"; then :
--  ac_cv_c99=yes
--else
--  ac_cv_c99=no
--fi
--rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
--CFLAGS="$old_CFLAGS"
--fi
--{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $ac_cv_c99" >&5
--$as_echo "$ac_cv_c99" >&6; }
--if test "x$ac_cv_c99" != xyes; then :
--  as_fn_error $? "gcc with GNU99 support required" "$LINENO" 5
--fi
--
- { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether gcc supports __attribute__((visibility()))" >&5
- $as_echo_n "checking whether gcc supports __attribute__((visibility()))... " >&6; }
- if ${ac_cv_visibility+:} false; then :
-diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
-index b348a71..6298547 100644
---- a/configure.ac
-+++ b/configure.ac
-@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ AS_IF([test "$use_locks" = yes],
- 
- AH_TEMPLATE([USE_LOCKS], [Defined if libraries should be thread-safe.])
- 
--AC_PROG_CC
-+AC_PROG_CC_C99
- AC_PROG_RANLIB
- AC_PROG_YACC
- AM_PROG_LEX
-@@ -96,39 +96,6 @@ m4_ifdef([AM_PROG_AR], [AM_PROG_AR])
- AC_CHECK_TOOL([READELF], [readelf])
- AC_CHECK_TOOL([NM], [nm])
- 
--# We use -std=gnu99 but have explicit checks for some language constructs
--# and GNU extensions since some compilers claim GNU99 support, but don't
--# really support all language extensions. In particular we need
--# Mixed Declarations and Code
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Mixed-Declarations.html
--# Nested Functions
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Nested-Functions.html
--# Arrays of Variable Length
--# https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Length.html
--AC_CACHE_CHECK([for gcc with GNU99 support], ac_cv_c99, [dnl
--old_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
--CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -std=gnu99"
--AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([dnl
--int foo (int a)
--{
--  for (int i = 0; i < a; ++i) if (i % 4) break; int s = a; return s;
--}
--
--double bar (double a, double b)
--{
--  double square (double z) { return z * z; }
--  return square (a) + square (b);
--}
--
--void baz (int n)
--{
--  struct S { int x[[n]]; };
--}])],
--		  ac_cv_c99=yes, ac_cv_c99=no)
--CFLAGS="$old_CFLAGS"])
--AS_IF([test "x$ac_cv_c99" != xyes],
--      AC_MSG_ERROR([gcc with GNU99 support required]))
--
- AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether gcc supports __attribute__((visibility()))],
- 	ac_cv_visibility, [dnl
- save_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
--- 
-2.33.0
-