gentoo resync : 25.04.2020

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 28 deletions

diff --git a/metadata/news/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade.en.txt b/metadata/news/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade.en.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 9c37eeeaf4bf..000000000000
--- a/metadata/news/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade/2014-02-25-udev-upgrade.en.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-Title: Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210
-Author: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
-Content-Type: text/plain
-Posted: 2014-02-25
-Revision: 1
-News-Item-Format: 1.0
-Display-If-Installed: <sys-fs/udev-210
-
-The options CONFIG_FHANDLE and CONFIG_NET are now required in the kernel.
-You will be warned of them if they are missing while you upgrade to
->=sys-fs/udev-210 by the package manager.
-See the package's README at /usr/share/doc/udev-210/ for more optional
-kernel options.
-
-The most reliable way of disabling the new network interface scheme is still
-the kernel parameter "net.ifnames=0" since overriding the
-80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/ no longer works since upstream
-renamed the file to /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules
-The actual configuration is at /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link, which
-you can override in /etc/systemd/network/
-So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules file or the .link file in /etc
-but using the kernel parameter is the most consistent way.
-
-Since both the systemd-udevd executable and the network configuration is stored
-at /lib/systemd, using a too wide INSTALL_MASK would be a mistake.
-
-[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_210
-[2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames