https://bugs.gentoo.org/904234
https://invent.kde.org/libraries/qca/-/commit/33a35a699928318032f62eab0e39e263c604ad9e
https://invent.kde.org/libraries/qca/-/commit/714073747c4a3ccff7a8c85c72872bdf6bd3db4a

From 33a35a699928318032f62eab0e39e263c604ad9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pino Toscano <pino@kde.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:51:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] hashunittest: run sha384longtest only for providers that
 support sha384

Fixes commit bdb0e9d37d78ec8e01d4008dba5243afe9029346 that accidentally
left the wrong logic when refactoring the file, and makes the check as
done in the other longtest tests.
--- a/unittest/hashunittest/hashunittest.cpp
+++ b/unittest/hashunittest/hashunittest.cpp
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ void HashUnitTest::sha384longtest()
     fillerString.fill('a', 1000);
 
     foreach (QString provider, providersToTest) {
-        if (!QCA::isSupported("sha384", provider)) {
+        if (QCA::isSupported("sha384", provider)) {
             // QTime t;
             // t.start();
             QCA::Hash shaHash(QStringLiteral("sha384"), provider);
-- 
GitLab

From 714073747c4a3ccff7a8c85c72872bdf6bd3db4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:19:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove test that openssl has decided it's wrong

--- a/unittest/pkits/pkits.cpp
+++ b/unittest/pkits/pkits.cpp
@@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ void Pkits::pkits4_1_4()
 
 void Pkits::pkits4_1_5()
 {
+    // openssl has decided that they don't want to support this ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
+    // https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20233
+#if 0
     QStringList providersToTest;
     providersToTest.append(QStringLiteral("qca-ossl"));
 
@@ -298,6 +301,7 @@ void Pkits::pkits4_1_5()
             QCOMPARE(cert.validate(trusted, untrusted), QCA::ValidityGood);
         }
     }
+#endif
 }
 
 void Pkits::pkits4_1_6()
-- 
GitLab