From 23b767af73549eeb4dd3069e09d0f2fcb88669a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: V3n3RiX Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:41:01 +0000 Subject: gentoo auto-resync : 22:03:2023 - 00:41:01 --- sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild') diff --git a/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild index ca9d13f5ddf7..3949e79bd0cb 100644 --- a/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild +++ b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-13.0.1.9999.ebuild @@ -30,12 +30,14 @@ if ! tc_is_live && [[ -z ${TOOLCHAIN_USE_GIT_PATCHES} ]] ; then KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86" fi -# Technically only if USE=hardened *too* right now, but no point in complicating it further. -# If GCC is enabling CET by default, we need glibc to be built with support for it. -# bug #830454 -RDEPEND="elibc_glibc? ( sys-libs/glibc[cet(-)?] )" -DEPEND="${RDEPEND}" -BDEPEND="${CATEGORY}/binutils[cet(-)?]" +if [[ ${CATEGORY} != cross-* ]] ; then + # Technically only if USE=hardened *too* right now, but no point in complicating it further. + # If GCC is enabling CET by default, we need glibc to be built with support for it. + # bug #830454 + RDEPEND="elibc_glibc? ( sys-libs/glibc[cet(-)?] )" + DEPEND="${RDEPEND}" + BDEPEND=">=${CATEGORY}/binutils-2.30[cet(-)?]" +fi src_prepare() { local p upstreamed_patches=( -- cgit v1.2.3