From 0f558761aa2dee1017b4751e4017205e015a9560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: V3n3RiX <venerix@koprulu.sector>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:04:12 +0100
Subject: gentoo resync : 29.12.2022

---
 sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild

(limited to 'sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild')

diff --git a/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..51819ad52713
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-12.1.1_p20220625.ebuild
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
+# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+
+EAPI=8
+
+TOOLCHAIN_PATCH_DEV="sam"
+PATCH_VER="8"
+PATCH_GCC_VER="12.1.0"
+MUSL_VER="5"
+MUSL_GCC_VER="12.1.0"
+
+inherit toolchain
+
+# Don't keyword live ebuilds
+if ! tc_is_live && [[ -z ${TOOLCHAIN_USE_GIT_PATCHES} ]] ; then
+	KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~loong ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 ~sparc ~x86"
+fi
+
+# Technically only if USE=hardened *too* right now, but no point in complicating it further.
+# If GCC is enabling CET by default, we need glibc to be built with support for it.
+# bug #830454
+RDEPEND="elibc_glibc? ( sys-libs/glibc[cet(-)?] )"
+DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
+BDEPEND=">=${CATEGORY}/binutils-2.30[cet(-)?]"
+
+src_prepare() {
+	toolchain_src_prepare
+
+	eapply_user
+}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3